now thats interesting.
if i understand correctly, you can only sue for breach of copyright if there is a loss of income.
so if joe blow made a stencil set for a pin that nobody makes then joe blow can't be sued because the persons with the legal right to make the stencils is not losing any income and is not making them?
The problem here is that Joe Blow will quickly burn the cash in legal fees arguing the point.As i have been told and still retain the email for reference..
"I dont need to be in the right to sue you... i will burn you in legal fees ... i have money to burn unlike you are your f*##ing stupid mates"
Now... does a man who burns his money feel warm??
