Author Topic: SHOULD PINBALL 2000 ever be redone again ?  (Read 738 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Private Gimp

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • ***
  • High Score Initials:
  • Forum Posts:
  • Mackay, Queensland
  • Fix'n and play'n Pinball
Re: SHOULD PINBALL 2000 ever be redone again ?
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2010, 11:55:24 PM »
I love my RFM, the playfield shots are middle of the road in skill which is fine and the art package is just awesome.
Very easy to work on and repair, the playfied coming out easily is a major plus. Just seems a little under done on rules development.

Not sure about SWE1 in as far a playability goes and heard as we all have that its a bit too repetative to play. Too much Jar Jar is the mantra.
I would like to get the SWE1 kit one day just for the hell of it so I have both games to play and evaluate on the platform.

Williams/Bally did a spectacular job building this pinball platform and is still the most advanced pinball platform ever devised.
I applaud the efforts of Big Guys Pinball and their Nucore system.

Pin2000 deserves to be further developed and isnt meant remain stagnant. If a new or modified Pin2000 software and or playfield
was devised I would be on it like a shot because the platform is just so good.

Might we ask for the best of both worlds, a retro Medievil Madness or Adams Family Pin2000??

Cliff