There was a brilliant show on Channel 9 (I think) over the weekend where Andrew Bolt was the host. I'd never given too much thought to the Carbon Tax, other than it was another revenue raising junket that served no real purpose.

But it really opened my eyes to the rubbish and lies Gillard speaks. She is an unelected clown and she has convinced herself that she is an "authority" on climate change. All these so called "experts" are on her own FUNDED panel of Climate Change Consultants.

The climate change debate is like a court case. Usually, each side has a legal representative and fair representation. Both sides of the argument present their case and the jury decide the outcome. If the climate change debate was to use the court case analogy, then the side representing the Government would have an "open chequebook" to hire the best legal team possible, and they would ensure all the tax payer funded costs are covered to best present their case. The opposition (to the Carbon tax), would not receive ANY funding, they would be "cut off" from government funding and not have access to ANY unbiased Carbon Tax experts that would effectively win the case against a Carbon Tax.

So what I understood - The government is "investing" HEAVILY into pushing an agenda onto us. In doing so, they are actively silencing the scientists that dispel the Myth. Any scientist that approves of the Carbon Tax, is given a mouthpiece and funding to their particular field. Anyone who voices an opinion AGAINST a Carbon Tax is having their funding reduced. That explains why most of the scientists who oppose the Carbon Tax are retired and are not at risk of their department funding cut.

Every single Pro Carbon Tax myth was explained and debunked. Most of the Pro Carbon Tax argument is based on predictive data produced by computer models with inconclusive data. Each "fact" Gillard presents on her propaganda road trip was debunked. The Earth's climate changes, it is part of an ever changing cycle of life.

It's all propaganda and politics based on inaccurate predictive data.